Autonomie in de geboortezorg

Geschreven door: Loes van der Kooij
Gepubliceerd op: 22 maart 2026

Autonomie wordt vaak genoemd als een kernwaarde in de geboortezorg. In beleid, richtlijnen en gesprekken klinkt het vanzelfsprekend: zwangeren mogen zelf keuzes maken, goed geïnformeerd worden en regie houden over hun zwangerschap en bevalling. Tegelijkertijd laten onderzoek en ervaringen zien dat autonomie in de praktijk niet altijd zo vanzelfsprekend is. Veel vrouwen ervaren dat beslissingen onder druk tot stand komen, dat protocollen leidend zijn of dat zij zich niet altijd gehoord voelen.

Wat betekent autonomie eigenlijk in de context van zwangerschap en geboorte? Wat zegt de wet over het recht om te kiezen of te weigeren? Hoe is onze kijk op autonomie door de geschiedenis heen veranderd, en welke invloed hebben medicalisering, richtlijnen en risicodenken daarop gehad? Waarom is autonomie belangrijk voor zowel zwangeren als zorgverleners en wat gebeurt er wanneer die ontbreekt? En is autonomie in de praktijk voor iedereen gelijk, of spelen sociale en economische factoren een rol?

In dit artikel nemen we je mee in deze vragen en verkennen we wat autonomie betekent in de geboortezorg, waar spanningen ontstaan en hoe we autonomie beter kunnen begrijpen en ondersteunen.

Wil je meer informatie over dit onderwerp? We hebben een heleboel:

Het artikel Keuzes maken
De masterclass van Rebekka Visser over Counselen bij zorgvragen buiten de richtlijn
De masterclass van Marjolein van Gelderen over Samen beslissen
De masterclass van Marjolein van Gelderen In gesprek over obstetrisch geweld.

Adeleke, Ali. 2007. “The impact of Health Insurance on Health Care Provision in Developing Countries” Ghana Journal of Development Studies 4 (2): 49-58

Alaszewski and Scamell 2012 Scamell, Mandie, and Andy Alaszewski. 2012. “Fateful Moments and the Categorisation of Risk: Midwifery Practice and the Ever-Narrowing Window of Normality during Childbirth.” Health, Risk & Society 14 (2): 207–21.

Andaya, Elise, and Mounia El Kotni. 2022. “The Anthropology of Reproduction.” In A Companion to Medical Anthropology, 213–29.

Baird and Kracen (2006) Baird, Katie, and Amanda C. Kracen. 2006. “Vicarious Traumatization and Secondary Traumatic Stress: A Research Synthesis∗.” Counselling Psychology Quarterly 19 (2): 181– 88.

Boeije, Hennie. 2009. Analysis in qualitative research. Sage publications.

Chadwick, Rachelle Joy, and Don Foster. 2014. “Negotiating Risky Bodies: Childbirth and Constructions of Risk.” Health, Risk & Society 16 (1): 68–83.

Davidson, Clare. 2020. “British Journal Of Midwifery - Feminism, Midwifery and the Medicalisation of Birth.” British Journal Of Midwifery.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie E. 1994. “The Technocratic Body: American Childbirth as Cultural Expression.” Social Science & Medicine 38 (8): 1125–40.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie E. 2001. “The Technocratic, Humanistic, and Holistic Paradigms of Childbirth.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 75 (S1): S5–23.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie E. 2003. Birth as an American Rite of Passage, 2nd ed. University of California Press.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie E. 2004. Birth as an American Rite of Passage: Second Edition, With a New Preface. University of California Press.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie E. 2005. “Anthropology and Birth Activism: What Do We Know?” Anthropology News 46 (5): 37–37.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie, and Elizabeth Davis. 1996. “Intuition as Authoritative Knowledge in Midwifery and Homebirth.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series 10 (2,): 237–69.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie E., and Melissa Cheyney. 2009. “Birth and the Big Bad Wolf: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Childbirth Across Cultures 5:1–22.

Davis-Floyd, Robbie E. and Fishel Sargent, Carolyn. 1997. Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge : Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

De Vries, Raymond, Therese Wiegers, Beatrijs Smulders, and Edwin Van Teijlingen. 2009. “The Dutch Obstetrical System: Vanguard of the Future in Maternity Care,” Birth Models That Work 31-50

Barnawi, Najla, Richter, Solina. and Habib, Farida. 2013. “Midwifery and Midwives: A Historical Analysis.” Nursing and Midwifery 2 (8) 114-121.

Beck, Ulrich., 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

DeWalt, Kathleen and Billie R. DeWalt. 2011. Participant Observation. A guide for fieldworkers. Second Edition. Plymouth: AltaMira Press.

DONA. 2005. DONA: “The birth doula’s contribution to modern maternity care.” International Doulas of North America.

Donnison, John. and Macdonald, Sue. 2017. “A history of the midwifery profession in the United Kingdom.” Mayes’ midwifery (15) 24–28

Douglas, Mary. 1990. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory.

Downe, Soo. And Dykes, Fiona. 2009. “Counting Time in Pregnancy and Labour” Childbirth, Midwifery and Concepts of Time. (1): 61-83

Ehrenreich, Barbara, Deirdre English, and Feminist Press. 1973. Witches, Midwives, and Nurses : A History of Women Healers. Old Westbury, N.Y.: The Feminist Press, New York.

Emmens, B., Martin, C. J. H., Patterson, J., & Martin, C. R. (2023). A Thematic Analysis of Narratives About Birth Satisfaction and Health Awareness From Postnatal Women Who Have High and Low Trauma Scores on the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist. International Journal of Childbirth, 13(4), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1891/IJC-2022-0036

Goodarzi, B., Helberg-Proctor, A., Brewster, L., & van den Akker, T. (2022, 8 september). ‘Ras’ en etniciteit registreren in de zorg: een precaire kwestie: Ondeugdelijke categorisering kan leiden tot onjuiste conclusies. Medisch Contact.

Green, Johan. 1999. “From accidents to risk: Public health and preventable injury.” Health, Risk & Society, 1(1): 25–39.

Gurevich, Ria. 2003. “The doula advantage.” Roseville: Random House. (5): 3-19

Hollander, M. H., E. van Hastenberg, J. van Dillen, M. G. van Pampus, E. de Miranda, and C. A. I.

Hunter, Cheryl A, and Abhurst. 2016. Understanding Doulas and Childbirth : Women, Love, and Advocacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Cop.

James, Ed C. 1993. “The consequences of legal issues that face the obstetrician.” Intrapartum fetal surveillance.

Kors, J., De La Croix, A., Martin, L., Verhoeven, C. J. M., Bakker, P., Peerdeman, S. M., & Kusurkar, R. A. (2022). Autonomy-supportive decision-making in maternity care during prenatal consultations: A qualitative interaction analysis. BMJ Open, 12(11), e063463. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063463

Lankshear, Gloria, Elizabeth Ettorre, and David Mason. 2005. “Decision-Making, Uncertainty and Risk: Exploring the Complexity of Work Processes in NHS Delivery Suites.” Health, Risk & Society 7 (4): 361–77.

Lazarus, Ellen S. 1994. “What Do Women Want?: Issues of Choice, Control, and Class in Pregnancy and Childbirth.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 8 (1): 25–46.

Lupton, Deborah. 2012. ‘Precious cargo’: foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical public health, 22 (3), 329–340

Graaff, Lisanne F. de, Adriaan Honig, Mariëlle G. van Pampus, and Claire A.I. Stramrood. 2018.

Stramrood. 2017. “Preventing Traumatic Childbirth Experiences: 2192 Women’s Perceptions and Views.” Archives of Women’s Mental Health 20 (4): 515–23.

Macdonald, Margaret. 2006. “Gender Expectations: Natural Bodies and Natural Births in the New Midwifery in Canada.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 20 (2): 235–56

Martin, Emily. 1987. “The Woman in the Body.” A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction.

McCourt, Christine. 2009. “Cosmologies, Concepts and Theories: Time and Childbirth in Cross-cultural Perspective.” Childbirth, Midwifery and Concepts of Time. (1): 37-60

Offerhaus, Pien, Suze Jans, Hukkelhoven, Chantal. De Vries, Raymond. And Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne. 2020. “Women’s Characteristics and Care Outcomes of Caseload Midwifery Care in the Netherlands: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 20 (1): 517.

Van der Pijl et al. (2021). Client-care provider interaction during labour and birth as experienced by women: Respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy. PloS ONE 16(2)

Soylu, H. M., Mendez-Figueroa, H., Chauhan, S. P., & Huntley, B. J. F. (2026). References Supporting Recommendations in Obstetrical Green Top Guidelines: An Overview of RCOG Clinical Guidelines. American Journal of Perinatology, 43(02), 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2601-8900

Stevens, Trudy. 2009. “Time and Midwifery Practice.” Childbirth, Midwifery and Concepts of Time. (1): 104-125.

Stone, Pamela K. 2009. “A History of Western Medicine, Labor, and Birth.” Childbirth, Across Cultures. (5): 41-54.

Washington, L. U. (n.d.). On Maternal Obligation: The Lens of Motherhood in The Abortion Debate.

WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. (n.d.). Retrieved July 2, 2025, from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215